Dec 23 2008
Jerry Brown: Governor or Attorney General
I am not a state lawyer. I don’t know all the particulars. But I do know that when someone elects you to the office of Attorney General in California, you ahve an obligation to represent the people - which includes representing ballot propositions that have passed and are now suffering legal challenges.
A few weeks ago, Jerry Brown said that he was going to recommend to the courts that they uphold Prop. 8 because it was the will of the people. He said that he had an obligation to defend ballot propositions that passed against legal challenges.
Imagine my lack of shock having learned that he’s not going to do that. In fact, he’s going to tell the court that Prop. 8 should be invalidated. Brown states that “Proposition 8 must be invalidated because the amendment process cannot be used to extinguish fundamental constitutional rights without compelling justification.” However, that’s not what he said he was going to say.
And that’s not what the job description of Attorney General of the State of California tells him to say.
However, this is what a Governor would do.
Jerry Brown has been running for Governor since he left that office a while ago. He’s made a run on lawsuits that sue cities and counties for not considering carbon emissions in their planning documents. He has made a history out of challenging things to keep his name in the papers, and bring what he considers the “majority” of Californian’s to his side. He’s hoping to win their votes in the next election for Governor.
But in the meantime, he’s the AG. He’s not acting like the AG. So how am I, a California voter, supposed to have any confidence that as Governor, he’s going to act like a Governor and not like someone running for the next highest office? I cannot.
So here’s my advice - stick to the job you have. And do a good job at it rather than trying to use it as a stepping stone to the Governor-ship.


